Publications
-
Read more
Implicit inducement of patent infringement – The Federal Court of Appeal hands down its ruling
Can a patent be infringed even if the patented product is not manufactured, assembled, or even used? Indeed, such infringement is possible. In fact, this is known as the theory of inducement of infringement. Naturally, acts of “inducement” must meet certain conditions before inducement of (…)
-
Read more
The duration of copyright protection in Canada is extended to 70 years as of December 30, 2022
On June 23, 2022, Bill C-19 received Royal Assent. The bill was introduced by the Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, and resulted in amendments to the Copyright Act1 that will come into force on December 30, 2022, further to an order in council issued (…)
-
Read more
Can an Idea, Style or Method Be Protected Under the Copyright Act?
Ahead of the 2021 holiday season, as children dream about the toys that Santa Claus will bring them, let’s take a look back at a landmark decision that reviews what is copyrightable under the Copyright Act. As visual artist Claude Bouchard (“Bouchard”) learned from the outcome of her legal action (…)
-
Read more
Winkler v. Hendley: The Federal Court applies a subjective standard to the notion of “history”
“Historical facts”1 are not protected by copyright. Referring to the Storming of the Bastille or the Battle of the Plains of Abraham will not get an author sued in Federal Court, but must these events have really happened to be considered “historical facts”? The Federal Court recently ruled on this (…)
-
Read more
The Doctrine of File Wrapper Estoppel in Canada: The Court of Appeal Hands Down its Decision
In December 2018, section 53.1 was added to the Patent Act (the “Act”) allowing reference to be made to communications exchanged with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) during the prosecution of an application with respect “[...]to the construction of a claim.” This concept is more (…)
-
Read more
The Court of Appeal Adds a Few More Shades to Canada’s Grey Market
In Canada, as elsewhere in the world, intellectual property owners have made numerous attempts to control their distribution channels through trademark law, copyright law, or exclusive contracts, without much success. However, in a recent decision (Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd. c. Simms Sigal & (…)
-
Read more
Intellectual Property: New Options for Patent Ownership Disputes
Since 1995, the Federal Court of Canada has refused to hear questions relating solely to patent ownership. In Lawther v. 424470 B.C. Ltd.1 the Federal Court declined jurisdiction, stating that “[t]his Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a dispute which is solely a matter of contract”, thereby (…)
-
Read more
Estoppel based on patent prosecution history in Canada: The Pandora’s box is opened
Nearly twenty years ago, the Supreme Court of Canada1 rejected the theory of estoppel based on a patent’s prosecution history, more commonly known as "file wrapper estoppel"2). At the time, Justice Binnie wrote, “[…]purposive construction, which keeps the focus on the language of the claims, seems (…)
-
Read more
Bell v. Cogeco: Unfair competition – the “best Internet experience” results in an unfavorable judicial experience
In the field of telecommunications, it is not uncommon to see competing Internet service providers engage in advertising war campaigns in order to attract new customers, particularly in this highly competitive market due to the small number of competitors. Competitors are prepared to do anything to (…)
-
Read more
Canada strengthens the protection of copyright and trademark rights with the enactment of new border enforcement measures
Since January 1st 2015, the sections of the Act to amend the Copyright Act and the Trade-marks Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts (“the Act”) with respect to the new border enforcement measures have come into force in Canada. The purpose of the Act is to help Canadian copyright (…)