Publications
-
Psychological Harassment in the Workplace: What's New?
Since June 1, 2004, the Labour Standards Act (hereinafter the "L.S.A.") requires employers to provide a work environment free from psychological harassment. Thus, employers must, as a first step, take reasonable measures to prevent psychological harassment and then, whenever they become (…)
-
Amendments to the Annual Declarations System for Enterprises in the Province of Québec
Some important changes to the Act respecting the legal publicity of sole proprietorships, partnerships and legal persons (the “Act”) took place effective January 1 st, 2006.The Act generally applies to all legal persons, partnerships and individuals carrying on an activity in the (…)
-
The new Quebec Parental Insurance Plan: What should you know?
The new Quebec Parental Insurance Plan: What should you know?
-
Are the Courts Distorting the Nature of Class Actions?
Are the Courts Distorting the Nature of Class Actions?
-
The Application of Ontario's Bill 198 to Securities Class Actions in Quebec
The Application of Ontario's Bill 198 to Securities Class Actions in Quebec
-
Disability Insurance: the Right to a Counter Expertise
Disability Insurance: the Right to a Counter Expertise
-
Insurance and Youthful Sins
Insurance and Youthful Sins
-
Corporate Directors: Suggested Precautions
Corporate Directors: Suggested Precautions
-
Directors' Liability, Indemnification and Insurance Coverage
Directors' Liability, Indemnification and Insurance Coverage
-
The Direct Recourse of a Subrogated Insurer
The Direct Recourse of a Subrogated Insurer
-
New Private Placement Rules: Quebec Harmonizes its Rules with the Rest of Canada
New Private Placement Rules: Quebec Harmonizes its Rules with the Rest of Canada
-
Determining Who Is a Reasonable Insurer: Is Evidence By an Expert Witness Required? That Is the Question
Determining Who Is a Reasonable Insurer: Is Evidence By an Expert Witness Required? That Is the Question
-
Fraudulent Misrepresentations: the Court of Appeal Revisits the Test
Fraudulent Misrepresentations: the Court of Appeal Revisits the Test