Publications
-
Read more
Disability and the duty to accommodate: loss of seniority and loss of employment clauses are still relevant!
The Supreme Court of Canada recently handed down a highly anticipated judgment in McGill University Health Centre (Montreal General Hospital) (the “MUHC”) vs. Syndicat des employés de l’Hôpital Général de Montréal (2007 SCC 4). This case sets out the scope of an employer’s (…)
-
Read more
Discrimination at work: Grievance Arbitrator or Human Rights Tribunal of Quebec... The debate rages on!
On November 30, 2006, the Human Rights Tribunal of Quebec released a judgment in which it concluded that a grievance arbitrator did not have jurisdiction over litigation stemming from allegations of employment discrimination.In the case of Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la (…)
-
Read more
The insurer's duty to inform: an increasingly heavy burden
It is known that an insurer has a considerable duty to inform in group insurance. The Superior Court in a decision specified the extent of this duty in Tanguay et al v. L'Ordre des ingénieurs du Québec and The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company of North York, doing business under the name (…)
-
Read more
Absenteeism and the Duty to Accommodate: the Supreme Court grants Hydro-Québec Leave to Appeal
Absenteeism and the Duty to Accommodate: the Supreme Court grants Hydro-Québec Leave to Appeal
-
Read more
Lavery, de Billy wins two class action lawsuits
Lavery, de Billy wins two class action lawsuits
-
Read more
Disability and duty to accommodate: The Supreme Court of Canada allows the employer's appeal
Disability and duty to accommodate: The Supreme Court of Canada allows the employer's appeal
-
-
Read more
The liability of manufacturers and specialized sellers: the Court of Appeal tightens the screw
The Court of Appeal rendered an important decision on October 31, 2006, which dealt with the liability of manufacturers and professional sellers, as well as several other related issues. More specifically, the Court of Appeal tightened the screw on the issue of manufacturers' presumed knowledge of (…)
-
Read more
Compulsory deduction of drug insurance premiums: a new obligation for employers
Do you offer your employees group insurance? If so, since January 1, 2007, under the Act respecting prescription drug insurance, you must deduct directly from the remuneration paid to each of your employees his or her portion of the premium applicable to the basic prescription drug insurance (…)
-
Read more
Neighbourhood annoyances: the Court of Appeal rules against the principle of no fault liability
On October 31, 2006, the Court of Appeal rendered two key decisions on the issue of neighbourhood annoyances in Quebec. It is greatly to their credit that these two judgments represent a return to more reasonable legal bases on this issue. The two Court of Appeal decisions followed trial court (…)
-
-
Read more
Watering down class actions? Not really...
On October 18th, 2006, the Quebec Court of Appeal rendered a much-awaited decision regarding class actions. The province’s highest court was called upon to rule on the issue of whether, when there is a multiplicity of defendants, it is necessary that a legal relationship exist between the (…)
-
Read more
An Estate Plan for the Business Owner-Manager: Why and How
If you are a business-owner-leader whose years of hard labour earned him substantial wealth, you certainly wish to maximize the value of the assets that will be transferred to your heirs. You also want such transfer to proceed harmoniously and at the lowest tax cost possible. To achieve these goals, (…)