Publications
-
Read more
Judge blows whistle to put a stop to checks from behind: $8,000,000 awarded to a quadriplegic hockey player
On February 1, 2016, the Superior Court of Québec rendered a significant decision in the area of civil liability in the context of the practice of a sport1. The judgment was widely reported in the media due, on the one hand, to the importance of the amount granted by the judge (8 million dollars) (…)
-
Read more
The Supreme Court of Canada will not review the duty of the insured to collaborate
On February 18 last, the Supreme Court of Canada1 denied leave to appeal in the matter of Intact Compagnie d’assurance c. 9221-2133 Québec inc.2, thus confirming the principles applicable to the duty of the insured to collaborate. The facts Following the theft of his vehicle, the insured filed a (…)
-
Read more
On appeal from a judgment on a Wellington-type motion
The Court of Appeal of Quebec recently ruled on a leave to appeal from an interlocutory judgment dismissing a Wellington type motion seeking to order an insurer to take up the defence of its insured. The decision of the Court in Technologies CII inc. v. Société d’assurances générales Northbridge1 (…)
-
Read more
Civil law interpretation : Does coverage under a builder’s risk insurance policy extend to an existing structure?
On February 19, 2015, the Court of Appeal of Quebec1 overturned a judgment rendered by the Superior Court2, on July 12, 2013, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Essentially, the Court had to determine whether coverage under a builder’s risk insurance policy extends to damage caused by (…)
-
Read more
Overlapping Insurance Policies: The Court of Appeal of Ontario toes the line!
On January 16 last, the Supreme Court of Canada refused to grant leave to appeal by Lombard following a judgment rendered on June 20, 2013 by the Ontario Court of Appeal.1This decision deals with the issue of overlapping excess and umbrella policies.THE FACTSIn January 1995, an apartment building (…)
-
Read more
Supreme Court of Canada agrees to hear Réjean Hinse appeal
On March 20, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada granted Réjean Hinse leave to appeal a decision involving an action in damages he brought against the federal authorities, represented by the Attorney General of Canada.In 1964, Mr. Hinse was wrongly convicted of taking part in an armed robbery and (…)
-
Read more
The Robinson Case: The Final Chapter
Last December 23, the Supreme Court of Canada partially overturned the decision of the Quebec Court of Appeal in the case of Cinar Corporation v. Robinson1 and reinstated most of the conclusions of the Quebec Superior Court.BACKGROUNDIn the 1980s, Claude Robinson (“Robinson”) developed a project for (…)
-
Read more
To What Extent are Insurers Required to Cover Premises where Criminal Activities are Conducted?
In a recent decision by the Court of Appeal of Québec, the Honourable Jacques Chamberland, J.C.A. reviewed the application of exclusion clauses contained in a home insurance policy in the context of criminal activities1.THE FACTSThe Appellant, Union canadienne compagnie d’assurance insured the (…)
-
Read more
The insurer's duty to defend and indemnify: a new judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal
On March 1, 2013, the Court of Appeal rendered a judgment on the insurer's duty to defend and indemnify the insured in the area of commercial general liability insurance.1 It confirmed the decision of the trial judge which had held that the insurer has the duty to defend and indemnify,2 and ordered (…)
-
Read more
The Court of Appeal confirms that the policyholder and the insurer may agree to modify the provisions of a group insurance contract without consulting the participants
The decision of the Court of Appeal in the La Capitale case has been expected since February 2012 when the Superior Court dismissed the class action taken against an insurer who, with the consent of the policyholder, had unilaterally modified the waiver of premiums clause in a group insurance (…)
-
-
Read more
When a tree falls: The Supreme Court of Canada confirms the large and liberal interpretation that must be given to Quebec’s Automobile Insurance Act
In a unanimous decision rendered on June 22nd, the Supreme Court of Canada confirms the principles previously established by the Court of Appeal: Quebec’s Automobile Insurance Act ("Act") must be given a large and liberal interpretation. In this case, the Court confirms that the mere use of a (…)
-
Read more
The policyholder and the insurer may agree to unilaterally modify the provisions of a group insurance policy
The La Capitale ruling had been expected since 2009, when the Superior Court authorized a class action against an insurer who had unilaterally modified the waiver of premiums clause in a group insurance contract in 2001.