Publications
-
Criminal negligence: The Court of Appeal of Ontario increases to $750 000 the fine imposed on Metron Construction Corp.
On September 4, 2013, the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered Metron Construction Corporation (“Metron”) to pay a fine in the amount of $750 000 for criminal negligence causing death.1 After Metron pled guilty to the offence, the trial judge ordered the company to pay a fine of $200 000. (…)
-
Quarterly legal newsletter intended for accounting, management, and finance professionals, Number 20
CONTENTS Life Insurance Policy: How to Extract Funds from a Corporation with No Tax Impact Constructive Dismissal Analyzed in the Context of a Business Acquisition The Right of Withdrawal, a Controlled Form of Contractual Freedom Transfers of Residences Involving a Spousal Testamentary Trust (…)
-
An analysis of constructive dismissal in the context of a business acquisition
The Courts have considered the concept of constructive dismissal on many occasions. Generally, the expression “constructive dismissal” refers to situations in which an employee does not agree to a substantial change made unilaterally by his employer to one or more essential terms of his employment (…)
-
The Metron Construction Corp. Case: Another conviction for criminal negligence in the area of occupational health and safety
Since the adoption of Bill C-45 amending certain provisions of the Criminal Code in March of 2004, employers have had to take on increased responsibility in the area of occupational health and safety. Indeed, the effect of sections 22.1 and 217.1 of the Criminal Code is to facilitate the laying of (…)
-
Does an employer have the right to forbid the recording of cell phone conversations by employees?
In the era of smartphones and their ever-increasing sophisticated applications, it may be difficult for an employer to control what employees do with their cell phones while at work. What is the extent of an employer’s powers when an employee makes use of his personal cell phone? Does an (…)
-
Legal newsletter for business entrepreneurs and executives, Number 14
Last Call: Do you have any private corporation shares in your RRSP? Plan Nord: Maximize your business opportunities Can the refusal to sign a non-competition clause constitute a just and sufficient cause for dismissal?
-
The Court of Appeal confirms that a distinction based on age provided for by section 56 of the AIAOD is not discriminatory
On June 14, 2012, the Quebec Court of Appeal confirmed the validity of the second paragraph of section 56 of the Act Respecting Industrial Accidents and Occupational Diseases (hereinafter the “AIAOD” or the “Act”). Although this paragraph establishes a distinction based on (…)
-
Can the refusal to sign a non-competition clause constitute just and sufficient cause for dismissal?
In a recent decision, Jean c. Omegachem inc., the Court of Appeal answered that question by ruling that an employee’s refusal to sign a non-competition agreement during employment, which had been discussed when the employee was hired but presented to him three years after commencement of (…)
-
Disciplinary Measures relating to the use of Computer Equipment : Coca-Cola is forced to reinstate an employee
The Commission des relations du travail (the «Commission») recently ruled on the way in which an employer proceeded to impose a disciplinary measure on an employee due to his use of computer equipment belonging to the employer.On October 11, 2011, the Commission allowed the complaint (…)
-