IN FACT AND IN LAW
A lawyer’s freedom of expression : there is a limit to what one can say
By :
February 2010
With regard to the professional obligations of a lawyer, is it possible outside the physical confines of the tribunal to let a judge know exactly what he thinks of him? Should the response be negative, does it not unduly restrain his right to freedom of expression otherwise guaranteed to all by virtue of the charters of rights and freedoms? This is the question to which the Court of Appeal had to respond recently by rendering judgment in the case of Doré v. Bernard, which has incited various reactions in the legal community.
LAVERY AT A GLANCE
An independent law firm, offering the full range of legal services to business. 175 lawyers in Montreal, Quebec City and Ottawa. Member of the World Services Group, an international network of service firms with offices in 120 countries.
OUR LATEST PUBLICATIONS
-
December 2011
In Fact and in Law - Limits of the deemed trust created under provincial tax legislation -
December 2011
In Fact and in Law - The Superior Court refuses to authorize a class action against a furniture and electrical household appliances giant -
December 2011
In Fact and in Law Express - OCRCVM v. Beaudoin and AMF (C.A.) – Courts of justice cannot homologate a disciplinary decision in the absence of a specific legislative provision to that effect








Mandatory fields
SEND
CANCEL