IN FACT AND IN LAW
The Court of Appeal authorizes an insurer to institute a subrogatory recourse as a preventive measure
By :
Bernard Larocque, Jonathan Lacoste-Jobin - June 2009
On May 14, 2009, the Court of Appeal put an end to a controversy in the case law on the interpretation by Article 216 C.C.P. concerning the procedural means available to the insurer to protect its subrogation rights.
The Court considered the following question: “Can an insurer, who is being sued by its insured for refusing to pay the indemnity, force the intervention of a third party who is potentially liable for the loss?”
After thoroughly reviewing the controversial case law on the issue, the Court answered the question in the affirmative, and allowed the insurer to implead the potentially liable third party in the litigation between the insurer and its insured.
LAVERY AT A GLANCE
An independent law firm, offering the full range of legal services to business. 175 lawyers in Montreal, Quebec City and Ottawa. Member of the World Services Group, an international network of service firms with offices in 120 countries.
 |
 |
 |
|
OUR LATEST PUBLICATIONS
-
December 2011
In Fact and in Law - Limits of the deemed trust created under provincial tax legislation -
December 2011
In Fact and in Law - The Superior Court refuses to authorize a class action against a furniture and electrical household appliances giant -
December 2011
In Fact and in Law Express - OCRCVM v. Beaudoin and AMF (C.A.) – Courts of justice cannot homologate a disciplinary decision in the absence of a specific legislative provision to that effect
Mandatory fields
SEND
CANCEL